[Skip to content]

GoSomething to say?
Join the forum, ask us a question, or comment
on the blog
Search our Site
Email Newsletter
Sign up for our free weekly
newsletter
Advertisement
.
Home > Blog > 2011 > Protecting your brand on the internet...beware the “brandjacker”!

 

Protecting your brand on the internet...beware the "brandjacker"

Man in suit using laptop

The internet is a great place to market your medical tourism services but because it is difficult to police, it can be easy for a domain name speculator to hijack your brand. Businesses can find that having spent years developing and investing in a brand, one day along comes a domain name speculator or “brandjacker” who aims to profit from the brand value and customer loyalty that legitimate marketers have built.

“Brandjacking” is difficult to combat; the internet crosses international barriers. When someone hijacks your brand or trademark by registering domain names that are clearly related to your business, it can lead to complex and lengthy legal action to protect your marks. There is a set of guidelines about domain name registrations and dispute resolution published by ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) that may be of help. See their Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy .

There’s nothing wrong with registering domain names that you may want to use in your existing or future business activities. I met a group of UK doctors once who had registered over 5,000 domain names related to various types of medical procedure. This was in the early days when you paid over $100 for a domain name! In our web publishing business, we own around 130 domain names... not that many... most of which are in active use for our sites. The problem arises when people start registering multiple domain names:

  • To obstruct the activities of an existing business by incorporating their brand or trademark into a domain name.
  • To divert visitors from an established web site (often by registering mis-spellings of domains).
  • To sell the name back to the brand owner at a premium.

Brandjacking in medical tourism

No business sector is immune to brandjacking. It’s fairly widespread, but ICANN and the registering bodies are beginning to clamp down on the practice.

It happens in the medical tourism sector. Recently, Dr Uwe Klein, Chairman of the European Medical Travel Conference (EMTC) was dismayed when he found that someone had registered domain names which conflict with his EMTC brand. His conferences adopt the format www.emtc2010.com, www.emtc2011.com, www.emtc2012.com and so on. Planning for his future events, Dr Klein found that someone had registered emtc2014.com, his conference brand -  europeanmedicaltravelconference.com -  and a string of similar names such as europeanmedicaltravelcongress.com .

Why would someone (other than the brand owner,  Dr Klein) register these names?

IMTJ is a media partner for EMTC 2012. I know Dr Klein well. He is a is a well-respected voice in the medical tourism world and has put a great deal of effort into making the European Medical Travel Conference a success  So, I did a bit of digging around to see whether this instance of brand hijacking was a one off.

The beauty of the internet is that it’s an open system (most of the time). And it’s the same with information on internet domain names. You can find out who registered what.

I did a search to find out whether the obstructive registrations were a one off.

The same individual had registered a total of 370 domain names! (You can view the full list here). Many of these domain names were related to medical tourism, particularly to the conference/congress/association sector of the medical tourism.

Perusal of the list threw up some other up some other “indicators” of brand hijacking and domain name speculation.

At number 11 and 12 in the list, there are two domain names  - arabhealht.com and arabheatlh.com -  which are closely related to the Arab Health brand,  the major health conference in the Middle East. Registering a misspelling of a competitor brand name in order to direct visitors away from their intended destination to your own site is not uncommon.

Why would someone (other than Arab Health) register these names?

At number 327 and 328 in the list, I found trentaccreditation.com and trentaccreditation.org.  These names represent the core brand of the QHA Trent Accreditation Scheme, a long established healthcare accreditation scheme based in the UK. (It’s similar in nature to JCI). I spoke to Professor Steve Green at QHA Trent Accreditation... he was bemused.

Why would someone (other than Trent Accreditation) register these names?

The list also contains the domain names of other businesses in the medical tourism sector e.g. One World Global Healthcare, Surgical Trip.

370 domain names... so, who owns them?

Well, if you have looked at the list, you may have worked it out. If you haven’t, it’s a “Jonathan Edelheit”. He is the CEO of the US based Medical Tourism Association.

ICANN is very clear about the registering of domain names:

  • “By applying to register a domain name, ..........you hereby represent and warrant to us that ...........to your knowledge, the registration of the domain name will not infringe upon or otherwise violate the rights of any third party; ......you are not registering the domain name for an unlawful purpose; ........... It is your responsibility to determine whether your domain name registration infringes or violates someone else's rights.”

ICANN also defines use of a domain name in “bad faith”.

  • “The following circumstances...... shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith:
  • you have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor.
  • by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to your web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location or of a product or service on your web site or location.”

You can draw your own conclusions about what motivated an executive officer of a non profit trade association to register some of these domain names and whether there is "bad faith". 

How to protect your business from brandjacking

So what can people learn from this, what could Dr Klein, Trent Accreditation, and Arab Health have done to protect their brand and what could they do now to “win back” their brand? In my next blog article, I’ll look at some of the steps you can take to protect your business from brandjacking and how to deal with brandjacking.


Date published: 14 October 2011


Comments

Comments provided below do not represent the views of IMTJ. Comments will be published 'as is' and will not be edited by IMTJ staff. IMTJ is hosting these comments, and is not undertaking an editorial role. However, it is editorial policy to publish comments that have been submitted anonymously. 

RSS (small)
Advanced Search

Recent Articles

About me

Keith Pollard

Keith Pollard

I am Managing Director of Intuition Communication Ltd, a web publishing business in the healthcare sector. Our sites include International Medical Travel Journal, Treatment Abroad, the medical tourism portal, DoctorInternet, the Arabic medical tourism portal and Private Healthcare UK, the UK's leading site for private healthcare services. I am a regular speaker and commentator on medical tourism and the independent healthcare sector.

Use the comment submission form below
You know...
to be considered an authority, one has to have legitimate influence over others and distinguish it from mere power, because, unlike power, authority is reciprocal, and depends on those which one has dominion ceding that authority to the one claiming the authority, as well as their earning it.

Few in the industry (and the number is declining each and every day, so I am told) have ceeded this power or authority or accepted them as influential.

Authority in an industry such as medical tourism comes from showing a seriousness of purpose, providing an edifying example and maintaining proper distance between the authority and the one being influenced.

I guess I just don't see the authority vested in them, nor earned.

Maria Todd, MHA PhD (07/08/2012 02:29:32)

Shameful behavior. These people are not to be trusted.

Mark Lyndon (28/10/2011 13:26:26)

Keith is entirely correct: brandjacking IS a questionable business practice that pushes the bounds of acceptable behavior (by an individual, entity or both). Given that there are those like MTA/Edelheit and others engaged in this type of behavior, brand owners, in addition to acquiring related domain names, would be well-advised to trademark their business names, logos, and the like. Doing so establishes the business entity's date of creation and when the name/brand was placed into commercial use with a government registrar, while also keeping off-limits commercial use of the name (and associated others) by nefarious others. Unlike simple business formation via filing articles of incorporation, trademarking is done strictly for the purpose of protecting your valuable brand, be it now, in the future or both. Business owners should consider undertaking this additional (and I believe, necessary) step at the same time they create their commercial entity.

@Maria--Yours is an outstanding tactic!! I may just bid on the name independently simply to drive the price up!

Jack Lundberg (27/10/2011 16:11:54)

@Keith - "a leader leads by example not force" - well said!

@Mahatma: "It is time for this industry to develop qualified leadership and ethical standards of behavior that can take the industry in the right direction. So far that has yet to happen on any level." also well said!

Onward....

Sandra Miller (24/10/2011 23:40:13)

Patrick
I agree 100% with your view that clients should “purchase multiple brand domains to protect their business”. The issue is not the registration of multiple domains. “Brandjacking” is about questionable business practices, disregard of ICANN rules and infringement of other brands. Few would condone that. I cannot see any justification for registering domains that infringe directly on another brand. It's not what you might expect of the CEO of a non-profit association that should be a shining example of good business practice and often speaks about “transparency”. In Europe, if the head of a non-profit were to indulge in such practices, he would be out of the door of his association the same day. But, I acknowledge that the USA is not Europe!

“The IMTJ and other organizations/conferences are likely perceived competitors”. In my way of thinking, the competitors for membership and trade associations are...other associations.

What the MTA is and how it is run is at the crux of the problem. It is why it has failed to win universal respect in the medical tourism world. It has done good things but continues to aggravate those with whom it should be working. IMTJ is clearly a for-profit publishing business. Nevertheless, it tries to present an independent view and to comment on what it sees as unacceptable practices. The MTA is a US based non-profit membership association.... through which its “owners” generate profit through conferences, magazines, and consultancy. It's the schizophrenic nature of the organisation that creates problems. One day it's a non-profit representing the interests of its members; the next day it's a consultancy business or a conference organiser or a facilitator in competition with its own members and with others in the industry.

As Sun Tzu would see it..." A leader leads by example not by force."

Keith Pollard (18/10/2011 16:41:32)

Keith, since you mention that you are preparing a follow-up article, I would suggest that you contact the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Bureau of Competition and ask them for comment regarding this type of business practice involving anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct, attempts to monopolize, and attempts to disrupt competition within this industry domain.

This way your readers will have clarity and a frame of reference from US regulators on whether this is lawful behavior or not. And if it is not, what steps can be taken to bring it to a stop. I would suggest also getting similar comment from State of Florida-Attorney General's office, so that you have a response at both the state and federal level regarding their views on this practice and pattern of behavior. I think that this would be very informative and beneficial for your readers in understanding matters relating to anticompetitive issues.

The web site address for the FTC (Bureau of Competition is: http://www.ftc.gov/bc/index.shtml

By the way, if it is lawful, you guys need to leave him alone and move on. This is an industry that has a high level of mistrust by the public already due to the unprofessional behavior of many of its players. It is time for this industry to develop qualified leadership and ethical standards of behavior that can take the industry in the right direction. So far that has yet to happen on any level.

Mahatma Davis (18/10/2011 16:26:52)

Patrick

It is perfectly proper to collect domains that protect your own business.

It is not proper and contrary to EU law to register and collect domains that are tiny variations of established conference organising competitors.I accept that the US is very much more lax on this area than the EU and that an American may not understand that what is an acceptable business practice in the USA is not so in Europe.

I had not realised that medical tourism was 'war "
and perhaps if American businesses and politicians were less aggressive ,we would have a better and more peaceful world.

Perhaps also if the MTA and those associated with it were less warlike and legally aggressive ,medical tourism would have a better global reputation.


Ian Youngman (17/10/2011 17:12:36)

As a member of the MTA, I do not find the practice of domain aggregation to be problematic. We own a medical tourism marketing agency and I often recommend that our clients purchase multiple brand domains to protect their business and to create future opportunity.

I speculate that Mr. Edelheit is purchasing domains to protect the MTA and his other companies. Like it or not: It is smart business.

The IMTJ and other organizations/conferences are likely perceived competitors, so the purchase of competitor domains is a smart move on his behalf. It is an agressive competitive strategy that will certainly offend and inconvenience some.
I encourage all businesses to consider purchasing multiple domains to protect their brand. We all need to manage and protect our brands in a competitive environment.

I do not find fault with Mr. Edelheit. I encourage all savvy interenet marketers to follow suit to protect your brands. We must take agressive postures with regard to protecting our internet brands. This is the only way to ensure our future competitiveness on the internet.

I urge all of you to set aside the petty nature of this accusatorial approach and work to model the successful practices of your competition.

As Sun Tzu would see it...this is the art of war.

Patrick Goodness (17/10/2011 14:52:45)

We've had a similar problem with our domain and brand name "dentalholiday" - after setting up the company and website www.dentalholiday.co.uk 6 years ago, we've had someone buy "dentalholidays" and even though we bidded for the recently available dentalholiday . com domain it was sold to some internet domain collecting speculators for over 3000$ :-(

Daniel Shaw (17/10/2011 07:03:02)

So most importantly; how do you protect against Brandjacking. ?. Whta is the foolproof defence. ?

Barry Pitter (15/10/2011 20:45:58)

This was a very interesting and informative article. Thank you for sharing
. Brian

Brian Piper (15/10/2011 09:51:38)

The MTA was organized as a 501C6 trade association. If memory serves, a 501(c)(6) is a type of tax-exempt, nonprofit organization in the USA that is less formally known as a business league. These not-for-profit entities don't engage in business; instead, they help bolster business conditions in other sectors, often acting as lobbyists or trade associations that promote a common interest.

Aside from the actual act of brandjacking on its face, it appears from this article that the CEO of the MTA is acting in a way that a reasonable person would assume is meant to benefit him personally.

He didn't register these to the MTA, so the MTA has clean hands, as I see it. That's a good thing.

I guess when you drill down, since neither he nor Ms Stefano have neither healthcare, medical, dental, thalasso, balneo, tourism, travel agency, spa or hotelier background, the trade association known as the "Medical Tourism" Association or the Health Travel Authority is neither, but in reality, just another conference company and pretty magazine publisher.

I guess there's nothing wrong with being a just another medical tourism conference company. And what's up with all the insurance related domains? Is that the next strategic conquest?

I just bought GalacticMedicalTourismConference.com and GalacticMedicalTourismAssociation.com after reading this. I'll let him bid on it with a minimum reserve of $100,000...or maybe offer it up to Richard Branson.

Maria K Todd, MHA PhD (14/10/2011 19:43:18)

"Elementary, my dear Keith!", did I hear someone say?

Zahid Hamid (14/10/2011 19:19:11)